Cooke’s Knee-to-Knee Hit on Ovie the Real Vengeance

by Fight


Alex Ovechkin and Nicklas Backstrom go after Matt Cooke on Sunday. Photo by Clyde of Clydeorama.com

Pittsburgh had a score to settle with David Steckel, because it was Steckel who delivered a ‘dirty’ hit to Sidney Crosby during the Winter Classic that caused Crosby to suffer a concussion. The Capitals – and seemingly everyone else – disputed that the hit was intentional, as video replays showed that Crosby turned into Steckel and Steckel didn’t make any motion to hit Crosby.

But that’s not the point. From the Penguins’ point of view, Steckel’s hit, accidental or not, had to be avenged. They’ve got to protect their star player and fight anyone who does anything to hurt him. They’ve got to show that anyone who messes with Crosby will have to suffer the consequences. (Read the Caps’ reaction to Steckel’s fight on DC Sports Bog.)

This is all part of The Code. There is nothing unusual about this and Washington understands that.

Like an outlaw motorcycle gang telling a prospect to rough up a local rube who badmouths the gang (or accidentally bumps into a member who falls to the ground), the Penguins gave former Notre Dame player and Penguins call-up Tim Wallace a chance to earn his stripes in Pittsburgh’s 3-0 loss Sunday. It doesn’t matter that Wallace didn’t play in the Winter Classic, or that, standing four inches shorter than Steckel, hardly makes the ideal opponent. It’s also said that Wallace wasn’t the Pens’ first choice to fight Steckel, because Steckel declined other invitations against more suitable opponents, which is understandable since Steckel himself is not a fighter.

The two fought, and the Penguins got their message across. Right?

Hardly. Sending an expendable player to fight David Steckel for his ‘hit’ on Crosby is only Phase 1 of this situation.

In the same period of the same game, the Penguins attempted real vengeance against the Capitals. Matt Cooke’s knee-to-knee hit on Alex Ovechkin, which could have severely injured the star player, was the retribution that Pittsburgh sought. Then, like Crosby, Ovechkin would be injured, too. Cooke, who was assessed a laughable two-minute tripping minor for the play, would be suspended for a few games, which is something Pittsburgh could overcome. They really don’t care about Steckel. You take out our star, we’ll take out yours.

So why didn’t they just send Wallace to attempt to injure Ovechkin? The same reason you don’t send a mob prospect to execute the opposition’s Don. You use your best hitmen for the job.

Could Cooke’s knee-to-knee have happened without Steckel’s hit on Crosby? Of course. Random acts of violence are part of hockey, too. But when things like that happen, it’s part of The Code to justify it with relevant history.

Later in the game, Matt Bradley sought revenge against Cooke by asking him to fight. “Sir, I challenge you to a duel.” Cooke declined. After all, from Cooke’s point of view, he had no obligation, because his dirty hit on Ovechkin was just retribution for something much worse.

So, it’s now the Capitals’ turn to answer the call. They’ve got to tell the Penguins: Don’t try to hurt our star player. The Caps did the honorable thing by requesting a fight, just as the Penguins did with Steckel. Cooke declined, perhaps trying to wrap up this soap opera. Or, perhaps he didn’t want to fight Bradley for the same reason Steckel didn’t want to fight other Penguins. Maybe had Marcus Johansson threw down the gauntlet, Cooke would’ve dropped the gloves to answer for his actions.

The Capitals, who are a relatively clean team, now need to target Matt Cooke. But if Cooke continues to deny fight requests (and Bradley’s request was certainly reasonable), then the Caps need to go after one of their star players. Not with a hit like what Steckel did to Crosby, which even Pittsburgh knows was questionable, but with a real shot and a real target.

Or, the Capitals can dress D.J. King. He, Matt Hendricks, Matt Bradley and John Erskine can rumble with the Penguins’ tough guys, Cooke included. It’ll all be in the name of settling this drama once and for all. No more knee-to-knee hits on the star players after that (at least, without historical cause). Sounds good? Settled, then. Do this, let the first period of the Monday, Feb. 21 game in Pittsburgh (on Versus) be a bloodfest, and let the stars play.

Get The Code: The Unwritten Rules Of Fighting and Retaliation In The NHL on Amazon.com. Videos after the jump.

Steckel’s Hit on Crosby

Steckel vs. Wallace

Cooke’s Hit on Ovechkin

Tags: ,

Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

You overclaim by suggesting that "seemingly everyone else" agrees with your view. That is likely a conclusion reached if you only read news coming out of the DC metro area or on websites devoted to a strong disliking of Crosby and/or the Pens. Further, your facts are revisionist at best. And due to Rule 48's disjunctive phrasing, intent is not required to impose Rule 48. Lastly, Wallace was not the first Pen to invite Steckel to fight; Wallace is just the first Pen who Steckel accepted the invitation to fight.

Who is this really? Sidney Crosby? Sidney, get back to practice.

I'm pretty sure the article says that Stecks declined a few fights before accepting Wallace. Learn to read.

No one should need the news to dictate for them whether Steckel's "hit" on Crosby was intentional. Even the most objective viewer, with any knowledge of the game, could easily tell you that the incident was completely accidental. Nice try blaming media bias but the simple fact is that Pittsburgh feels entitled to what is clearly unwarranted retribution. That said, I hope the Pens bring on more on Feb. 21 and let the Caps respond fully.

Steckel, is that you? Has is Wussington, D.C.?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] change: Is Caps' reaction to Cooke's hit on Ovechkin justified?Washington Post (blog)Cooke's Knee-to-Knee Hit on Ovie the Real VengeanceCapitals OutsiderBoudreau calls out Cooke for his cheap shot on OvechkinBaltimore SportsReport.comSB [...]